Science Olympiad engages in competition

By Jen Luu

On Mar. 18, the PHHS Science Olympiad participated in its annual competition hosted by San Jose City College’s science department.  The competition was divided between divisions B and C.  The B Division is reserved for middle school students, while the C Division is for high school students. A total of 31 schools participated. This year, Piedmont had two teams: Piedmont Hills White and Piedmont Hills Maroon.
To prepare for the competition, members devoted themselves to practicing for months.

“We were on it.  We set up a tent in front of the science building and waited for our events,” recounted Captain Anne Tran.

Once the whole team settled down at the designated area, they awaited their respective competition times.

“Each event has a different time slot, and we were given that schedule before we arrived,” stated Anne.

There was a variety of categories for individuals and teams to pick from. The primary categories were biology, chemistry and physics.  While some topics may be large in scope, they were divided into subcategories.

“I specialized in biology and took the ecology test,” explained competitor Jeffrey Chang.

After the teams and solo participants finished their exams, the score was calculated based on the type of competition.

“Individually, it’s just whoever scored the highest,” said Jeffrey.

However, the scoring guide for teams is different. Raw scores on the answer sheets are calculated as follows: first place receives one point, second place receives two points and so on. Contrary to the traditional system of scoring, the team with the lowest overall score wins.

Palo Alto High placed first and received a medal, while Piedmont Hills White placed 21 and Piedmont Hills Maroon placed 22.

Despite the low placement, members enjoyed the overall experience.

“The test itself was uneventful; it was more of the bonding aspect,” recalled Anne.

Though PHHS did not place first, it still laid the foundation and momentum for future competitions since this year was its second year participating.

“Michelle and I are very proud of everyone who competed because they put in a lot of effort and the officers helped immensely with fundraising,” said Co-President Veronica Roy.

Math team places in SCVMA

By Andrew Huynh

On March 18, Piedmont Hills math students competed once again in the 54th Annual SCVMA (Santa Clara Valley Mathematics Association) Math Field Day.

SCVMA is a team competition which encourages student and teacher enthusiasm about and involvement in mathematics. Piedmont Hills’s participants were the Pirate math team and other students. Students from Sierramont Middle School, part of the Berryessa Union School District, attended as well.

“We’re decently sized,” said co-captain Addison Chan, who is also one of the captains alongside sophomores Anne Ouyang and Sophia Xiao. The math team typically has 15 to 20 members who meet on Fridays, according to junior Michael Wang.

The event began at 8 am at West Valley College, but the actual competitions did not begin until 8:45 am. All contests ended at 10:30 am and the awards ceremony was held at 11am.

“I won sixth place, so I took home a trophy,” affirmed Addison. “Piedmont did really well this year. We took first place overall.”

Freshman Chujun Xu and Anne both took home trophies as well, obtaining first and sixth place in their respective categories.

The Pirate math aficionados had to practice in order to do well in the competitions, which allowed all students from sixth to twelfth grade participate. Subjects covered include Statistics, Algebra 2, Precalculus and Calculus.

“I did a lot of practice tests to prepare,” explained Michael. “I also really enjoyed the free bagels they gave out after.”

Although many may cry at the thought of voluntarily doing math outside of the classroom on weekends at competitions, the math team enjoys it.

“I like math because it’s challenging but also logical. There are always many ways to a problem, and clever solutions are always interesting to think about,” commented Addison. “It’s probably my favorite subject.”

History Team makes history

By Vivian Lin

The Piedmont Hills History Team went to UC Berkeley to compete in the Northern California Championships History Bee and Bowl on Mar. 18.

The competition consisted of five different rounds, with each round divided into sub rounds: toss up, bonus, speed and final. The scoring and placements of the teams worked as a bracket system, with each team moving on to the next round depending on how well they scored in the previous.

History Team sent two squads, Junior Varsity and Varsity, to compete in the History Bowl, but both did not make it to semifinals. However, both teams qualified for the National History Bee and Bowl, which takes place in Washington DC next weekend from April 21-23.

“We totally exceeded our goals in my opinion, (and) we did really well against other schools. We played against Saratoga, and we didn’t win against them but we gave them a run for their money,” expresses president Nala Chen.

Members of the History Team trained tirelessly for the state competition, staying after school for hours to practice for their events. They used a variety of different questions, all from previous competitions, to prepare themselves as much as possible.

“We drilled a lot of speed rounds and focused on buzzing in before you had time to psych yourself out and think too hard about something. It wasn’t not knowing the questions, it was not answering fast enough,” explains History Team Advisor Amanda James.

Studying for the competition proved to be a challenge for the members, as well. Questions covered all of human history as well as other topics like art, science and modern pop culture.

“Human history is the past 5000 years, and sometimes questions pop up that are so obscure that I’ve never even heard of (the person’s) name,” laments Varsity member Julia Liang.

The team is currently fundraising for the national competition, and will decide who will represent Piedmont Hills based on availability. Because the competition is during spring break, many members may face conflicts with their schedules.

“The team dynamic is really nice! For the first week it was kind of awkward because no one knew each other, but after that we warmed up and now we just joke around,” jokes Nala.

They hope to raise enough money to be able to compete, and the remaining funds will be saved for next year.

Global warming: the world is too much with us

Editorial

Have you ever thought about whether turning off your lights to save electricity really helps the earth? Or if disregarding   the meat options actually make an impact? To some, these actions may seem futile compared to the impact that mass industrialization has. Such concerns are understandable. Dishing out tips is simple, but tracking the effects of them is not as straightforward.

By now, many of us have probably seen media coverage on environmental issues and ways to combat them. While awareness is immensely important, what is the point of that if no one takes action?

The alarms have been blaring for quite some time. Everywhere we turn, the signs are glaring. While some may think the sun is the reason for the increase in warm temperature, it is moreso attributed to man-made causes. The Intergovernmental Panel, a group of 1,300 independent scientific experts from around the world under the United Nations, concluded that there is more than a 95% probability that human activity in just the past 50 years have warmed the planet.

Commonly known as the greenhouse effect, certain trapped gases have created a blanket around our planet. Emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxides have interfered with the balance of Earth’s atmosphere and contributed to the mass warming. The majority of these greenhouse gases result from the burning fossil fuel to produce energy, although deforestation and industrial processes have also contributed to this ongoing problem.

We also have to address some misconceptions as well. Generally, the terms weather and climate are used interchangeably. However, there is a slight difference between them. Weather refers to the changes of an area throughout a short time span.  On the other hand, climate change refers to the overarching conditions that characterize a region over a long period of time. Based on this, climate change has a much graver connotation: prolonged changes in an atmospheric region that cannot easily be reversed.

Despite the importance of practicing eco-friendly methods due to the alarming reality, these changes in lifestyle may be temporary. Because the results are not immediate or apparent, people may feel discouraged to continue their efforts in the long run. Not only that, but people may project the responsibility onto someone else. Due to the massive amount in population, the responsibility is not explicitly directed towards anyone. As a result, this dilutes the severity of global warming issues and undermines the importance of collective efforts.

Considering how our lives are directly impacted by the effects of global warming, we must carefully consider the full extent of our actions. Human societies have enjoyed the current climate for years after the end of the last ice age several thousands of years ago, and a warming climate will bring about many changes that can affect our water supply, agriculture, the natural environment, as well as our own healthy and safety.

Although it is hard to tally how much of an effect we make, it is better than doing nothing at all.  The statistics at least provide us with concrete, substantial evidence of the increase in global warming.  Drawing upon facts from NASA’s (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) climate website, the consequences are severe.

  1. From 1884 to 2016, 9 out of the 10 hottest years occurred since 2000. The exception is in 1998.
  2. Carbon dioxide levels have been the highest in the past 650,000 years.
  3. Global sea levels have risen by 8 inches since 1880, and they are predicted to rise another 1 to 4 feet by 2100 due to the expansion of seawater from the icecaps.
  4. Glaciers are retreating among several areas in the world, including Alps, Andes, Alaska, Rockies, and Himalaya.
  5. Since the early 1980s, hurricane frequency, duration and intensity have increased.

The magnitude of these effects may not completely register with people.  We may think that because some of these consequences have not personally affected us, then we are safe from the dangers of global warming. The real questions is: can we still stop global warming? In short, no. Humans have already produced too much greenhouse gases emissions, and climate change has already taken place. If we were to completely stop the creation of these gases, it would still take several decades, centuries even, to see a effective change in the planet.

While the harsh truth of reality may be discouraging, there is still a solution. People can prevent the absolute worst of climate change from happening. This involves a two-step approach: mitigation and adaption. Mitigation refers to reducing the amount of greenhouse gases that enter the atmosphere, and adaptation refers to learning how to live with the changes that have already taken place.

However, noticeable improvement requires a global effort. While it is primarily a massive environmental issue, it also encompasses several other issues. Social, economic, and political aspects of everyday life are intertwined and all contribute to the warming of the earth. To truly make an impact, changes must start at the top and trickle down.

If global warming doesn’t endanger our generation, then it may reach the next.  The luxury of ignoring a critical issue is coming to an end.  The Earth will still be here long into the future, but it may not provide a sustainable environment for us. If we don’t take action now, then when will we?

How much water do we humans actually need?

By Asha Lujan (Guest Writer)

Our planet is 70% water. Our bodies are 50-60% water. You can’t refute that water is important. So, are you drinking water?

Everyone thinks that they are getting enough water. But, how much water is enough? 8 glasses of water a day, right? Well that really depends on several factors. How active are you? Are you drinking diuretic drinks? How much do you weigh?

Water is very important for many of your body functions. It lubricates joints, removes wastes, flushes toxins, cushions joints and bones, moistens oxygen for easier breathing, regulates body temperature, and empowers the body’s natural healing process. Most of the cells in your body and your body fluids are water.

The body can produce some water through it’s normal processes about 8%. But, the other 92% of water must be ingested through the foods we eat (fruits and vegetables) and drink.

Being active, exercise and sports can be very dehydrating. If you sweat, you are losing water and electrolytes. Lots of people drink sports drinks to rehydrate after exercise and playing sports but, just like coffee, tea, juice, and soda, sports drinks can also be a diuretic. Diuretics make you lose water in the form of urine.

They can be helpful but, there is a bunch of sugar in them (which is a diuretic) dextrose (which is another form of sugar), and brominated vegetable oil which is synthetic chemical that was first used as a flame retardant. It’s not a diuretic but, yuck!. You are losing water just as you are trying to rehydrate.

So how much water is enough? That depends on your weight. A larger person will need more water than a smaller person. Makes sense, right? An easy equation for figuring out how much water you should be drinking is your body weight divided by 2. The answer is the number of ounces you should be drinking. For example: 200 pounds divided by 2 equals 100.

Therefore, a 200 pound person should be drinking 100 ounces of water per day, pretty simple. But, if you are drinking diuretic drinks you need to replenish your water stores too. For every 8 oz., of diuretic drinks you should replace it with 12-16 oz. of of water. A venti coffee is 20 oz. You would need to drink half your body weight oz. plus 30-40 additional oz. to be optimally hydrated. That’s a lot of water!

That water should also have electrolytes. Electrolytes are: “Salts and minerals that can conduct electrical impulses in the body. Common human electrolytes are sodium chloride, potassium, calcium, and sodium bicarbonate. Electrolytes control the fluid balance of the body and are important in muscle contraction, energy generation, and almost every major biochemical reaction in the body. (medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Electrolytes)

Electrolytes help your body hold on to water. Just drinking lots of water without electrolytes washes away the electrolytes your body already has. Once again you will be dehydrating yourself while trying to hydrate. How do you get electrolytes in your water? Again, there is a simple solution.

You can purchase an electrolyte solution or add a pinch of sea salt. You could also add a squeeze of lemon with the sea salt to add potassium and calcium which are in electrolyte solutions.

For those of you who don’t like water you can infuse your water with some cut fruit or cucumber slices. Fresh and delicious. Happy hydrating!

Our future in space

By Syed Rahim

“Mankind was born on Earth. It was never meant to die here.” So goes the tagline of the blockbuster 2014 film Interstellar. In it, the Earth is suffering from a catastrophic crop blight, inflating food prices and leaving millions in poverty. Under the leadership of handsome scientist Matthew McConaughey, a group of hotshot scientists embark on a not-so-stellar expedition across the cosmos to save humanity from extinction.

Spoiler alert: we survive! But not because we found a magical cure for our crops. Rather, we packed our bags and set up shop somewhere else.

Though Interstellar is a work of science fiction, it’s not out of the question to consider the future it shows. Though our circumstances aren’t exactly as dire as portrayed in the film, they’re not a far cry from the potential future scientists are predicting.

And what hellish, apocalyptic future might that be? For one, melting glaciers and rising sea levels means coastal areas being flooded. As ocean water absorbs excess heat and carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, coral reefs housing millions of planets will die.
As for the direct effect on humans, estimates by the The Internal Organization for Migration report the displacement of 200 million people by 2050.

“Between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause approximately 250,000 additional deaths per year, from malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea and heat stress,” according to the World Health Organization.

At the root of those pesky doomsday scenarios is Global Warming, the term used interchangeably with Climate Change. According to the Oxford Dictionary, Global Warming is defined as “a gradual increase in the overall temperature of the earth’s atmosphere generally attributed to the greenhouse effect caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons, and other pollutants.”

You may be asking, “All this sounds terrible. Where is the good news?” Well, there is none. The point is that things are only getting worse, and where to go from here is up to debate.

The accepted solution among climate scientists is to limit the emission of greenhouses gases that are warming up the atmosphere. This means cutting emissions from coal and natural gas to reverse our planet’s crash course to superheating. But what if the solution isn’t meant to be found here, on Earth?

The problem with space expansion is the cost involved in sending people out of orbit. Every pound sent out using the Space Shuttle costs $10,000. The launch of a Space Shuttle costs about $450 million.

With the proliferation of private space companies like SpaceX and Virgin Galactic, the process of sending average people into orbit will become much easier and less expensive in the future. Dozens of earth-like planets are being discovered every year, some of them not farther than a couple of light-years.

“Our only chance of long-term survival is not to remain inward looking on planet Earth but to spread out into space,” remarked renowned astrophysicist Stephen Hawking. “Our only chance of long-term survival is not to remain inward looking on planet Earth but to spread out into space.

Once the fight for limited resources begins, it’s only a matter of time before war and disease kill millions. And once our planet has totally been exhausted, there really is no reason to hope for a future.

That being said, don’t worry! There’s no point in being pessimistic. Space travel is expensive, but research and development is driving down the cost every day.

As long as humans have been exploring the Earth, we’ve been looking up at the sky. Our ancestors before us were not only explorers of the seas, but of the stars. As corny as it sounds, the survival of the human race could very well depend on our exploration of the universe. To quote Matthew McConaughey, “We used to look up at the sky and wonder at our place in the stars. Now we just look down and worry about our place in the dirt.”

Science teacher by day, extreme athlete by night

By Emily Zhao

Science teacher Meredith DeRoos transferred to Piedmont Hills this year and teaches biology and forensics.

Originally from Pennsylvania, Ms. DeRoos moved to California in her senior year of high school to Santa Barbara, where her mother got a job. Like her mother, she decided to pursue the line of teaching after her friend introduced her to a credentials program.

“I had a friend in the credential program that told me what it was like teaching, and it sounded like something I would really enjoy. So I decided to go to the credential program and found out that I really love teaching,” explains Ms. DeRoos.

While teaching is Ms. DeRoos’s day job, she enjoys runing, biking and dancing in her free time.

“I’ve (run) three marathons before, and I’m training for one right now. It’s going to be my worst time ever, because it’s been like four to five years since I’ve ran one. I have a lot of schoolwork, so I don’t have as much time to train as I would like,” says Ms. DeRoos.

To train for her upcoming marathon, she runs five times a week, cumulating anywhere from four to twenty miles a day. In the past, Ms. DeRoos ran the San Diego Marathon, Avenue of the Giants and the Humboldt Redwoods Marathon. Her favorite race by far is the Humboldt Redwoods Marathon, the same race she is currently training for.

“You run through the redwoods so there’s a lot less people. The San Diego (Marathon) had too many people, and this one is just you and trees, so it’s pretty nice,” elaborates Ms. DeRoos.

She began running marathons on a whim.

“I used to be a waitress, and my coworker came in one day into our restaurant and asked me if I wanted to run a marathon with her. I said okay. She taught me how to run—I wore (a combination of) big hiking boots and sneakers the first time we went running. That wasn’t a good idea,” laughs Ms. DeRoos.

Aside from running, she is also an avid dancer. Ms. DeRoos takes dance classes in her free time, learning Hawaiian dancing, ballet, and more. Additionally, she also loves traveling.

“I traveled around the country in a motorhome for two months with my mom when I was a teenager. We started in Pennsylvania, then drove down to Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico, California, Oregon, Washington and then back across. That was by far the best vacation I’ve ever had—everything was so new,” she recalled.

Next year, Ms. DeRoos plans on teaching Biotechnology. In the future, she plans on learning Spanish fluently and running at more races.

Eating environmentally

By Jen Luu

Usually when people hear about healthy eating, they may think of bland and mundane food.  However, it doesn’t have to be that way.  In honor of April’s eco-friendly theme of improving the health of the earth, it is also important to do so with our own food choices.

Opt for fresh fruit instead of sugary snacks.  While it may be hard to resist the convenience and sweetness of a Snicker’s bar or a Pop Tart, the abundance of fruit can just be as delicious.  There is a vast range to choose from: cherries, plums, apricots, watermelons, tangerines, dates and several more.  These succulent choices provide many more valuable nutrients than their packaged and processed counterparts.  Just one Toblerone bar has 112 grams of sugar, while one cup of blueberries only has 15.

Eat brown rice instead of white rice.  Although it is a regular custom for many Asian families to eat white rice, going for the alternative may yield more advantages in the long run.  White rice does not contain many nutrients due to its excess refinement and processing; several of its outer layers are removed, ultimately stripping away most of its beneficial qualities.   In contrast, brown rice only loses its outermost layer.  Because of the lack of refinement, brown rice retains many of its vitamins and minerals.  According to livestrong.com, brown rice has “much higher levels of phosphorous and magnesium — two nutrients that nurture your skeleton.”

Make smoothies.  They are a great method of incorporating wholesome ingredients efficiently into your diet.  For those who are constantly on-the-go, blending together a variety of fruits and vegetables into a drink is an effective compromise.  Not only that, but smoothies also give access to free reign over creative combinations.

Check the nutrient facts before purchasing.  Often times, people are not aware of the ingredients they put into their bodies.  As a result, they may not be fully informed when deciding their food choices.  Making a simple, yet conscious effort of actively educating yourself may influence you to choose a better option.

To some, these changes may take some time to develop, which is completely okay.  Small, gradual changes will eventually yield results as people continue to slowly implement these suggestions.

While it is important to maintain your health through lifestyle changes, it is also acceptable to indulge in that milk tea once in awhile.  Otherwise, too much restraint may lead to binge-eating.  Moderation is key.

Reduce your carbon footprint

By Vivian Lin

As humans evolve, they begin to damage the environment—thus creating the need for conserving the environment.

“Polluting lakes and climate change cause species to die,” freshman Nghi Nguyen explains.

Because of these consequences, some are realizing that the environment needs to be conserved.

“I think being humans and having this amazing ability to use our logic and our (reasoning), we have a responsibility to make sure that we take care of every living thing on the planet and that their ecosystem is healthy,” English teacher Ryan Lundell says.

One reason to preserve the environment is that people continue to rapidly use up limited natural resources provided by the environment. According to The Guardian newspaper’s website, the six natural resources that are used the most are water, oil, natural gas, phosphorous, coal and rare earth elements like scandium and terbium.

“If we are using up those resources, then it won’t be there for future generations and will cause extreme suffering and death. We will then basically suffer from our recklessness, which I don’t think is morally right,” Mr. Lundell elaborates.

Some people still do not understand why we should preserve the environment. According to Mr. Lundell, ignorance and laziness are the main contributors to having no motive to start doing so.

“It does not concern them because it’s kind of inconvenient (to preserve it). It takes more effort to recycle, to use less waste, and to live a sustainable, and eco-friendly life,” explains Mr. Lundell.

Another reason is that humans and other organisms depend on the environment and it depends on us. For example, people eat cows that eat plants that need bees to pollinate them. That’s why humans have an obligation to protect the natural habitats of the organisms as well as theirs.

“The present is much worse than the past,” Nghi begins. “At least, (in the past), icebergs were not melting and polar bears were happy.”

“We definitely have seen some human made changes in the last hundred to hundred fifty years. I still think we have a beautiful world, but we have to wake up and realize that it’s not what it used to be,” Mr. Lundell implores.